Malaysian Trade Union Congress V Menteri Tenaga Air Dan Komunikasi

It was held that underneath the said order the proper to make application for judicial assessment of the exercising strength of a public responsibility used to be no longer only restrained to individuals but additionally relevant to a classification of folks in this case 7 malaysian trade union congress v menteri tenaga air dan komunikasi 2014 3 mlj 145. In a recent judgment delivered on 12 february 2014 the federal court in malaysian trade union congress 13 ors v menteri tenaga air dan komunikasi anor unreported mtuc case held that the test laid down by the supreme court in government of malaysia v lim kit siang 1988 2 mlj 12 lim kit siang to determine whether a claimant has capacity or standing to initiate an action. This is where the federal court case of malaysian trade union congress 13 ors v menteri tenaga air dan komunikasi anor which is actually a major groundbreaking case in malaysia but we won t bore you with legal history needs to be looked at.

kerpa singh v bariam singh fact kerja kursus sejarah tingkatan 2 sabah dan sarawak keris siamang tunggal full movie download kesan buruk penggunaan laman media sosial keluarga tunku abdul rahman putra al haj keluarga tan sri shahril shamsuddin keris siamang tunggal full movie kelebihan 21st century vitamin c 1000mg

Malaysian trade union congress ors v menteri tenaga air dan komunikasi anor 2014 2 clj 525 fc 2014 3 mlj 145.

Malaysian trade union congress v menteri tenaga air dan komunikasi. The relevant portion of the judgment is extracted as below. Malaysiantrade union congress ors v menteritenaga air dan komunikasi anor federalcourt putrajaya civilappealno01 f 6 03of 2013 w arifin zakaria chief justice zulkefli cj malaya hashim yusoff suriyadi and hasan lah fcjj 12 february 2014 administrative law judicial review application for review of minister s. Generally a judicial review application can be brought on the following 3 main grounds.

Constitutional law dr mohd nasir bin hashim menteri dalam negeri malaysia 2006 mlj 213. Chong fook sin v amanah raya bhd ors 2010 7 clj 917 fc 2011 1 mlj 721. Selangor freedom of information enactment 2011 sel.

Penang freedom of information enactment 2010 pg. Malaysian trade union congress ors v menteri tenaga air dan komunikasi anor 2014 3 mlj 145. Sivarasa rasiah v badan peguam malaysia anor 2010 2 mlj 333.

Majlis agama islam selangor v bong boon chuen ors 2009 6 clj 405 fc 2009 6 mlj 307. This was decided by the federal court in malaysian trade union congress ors v menteri tenaga air dan komunikasi anor 2014 3 mlj 145. 2007 clj 14 ca madhavan nair anor pp 1975 mlj 264 mark koding pp.

Although the progressive decision in the 2014 federal court case of malaysian trade union congress 13 ors v menteri tenaga air dan komunikasi anor is laudable the courts should consider doing away with requirements of the adversely affected test altogether and adopt wider interpretations of locus standi as held in the indian supreme court case of malik brothers v. The test of locus standi was considered by federal court in malaysian trade union congress ors v menteri tenaga air dan komunikasi anor 2014 3 mlj 145 as the adversely affected test where the applicant has to show that he has real and genuine interest in the subject matter.